The Requirement of Wife's Consent for Rujuk (Resumption of Marriage): A Normative Critique of Article 165 of the Compilation of Islamic Law from the Perspective of the Shafi‘i School of Thought

Authors

  • Muhammad Imam Hafili Sekolah Tinggi Dirasat Islamiyah Imam Syafi’i, Indonesia
  • Misbahuzzulam Misbahuzzulam Sekolah Tinggi Dirasat Islamiyah Imam Syafi’i, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i4.3861

Keywords:

Rujuk, Shafi'i School of Jurisprudence, Islamic Family Law, Compilation of Islamic Law, Wife's Consent

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the position of a wife's consent in the rujuk (reconciliation) process from the perspective of the Shafi'i School of Jurisprudence (Mazhab Syafi’i) and Article 165 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (Kompilasi Hukum Islam), the driving factors behind the shift in the legal framework regarding the husband's right to rujuk, as well as a methodological critique of the arguments underlying the requirement of the wife's consent. This study employs a qualitative method with a library research approach. The results of this study indicate that: (1) There is a difference in perspective between the Shafi'i School and the Compilation of Islamic Law regarding the requirement of the wife's consent in rujuk. (2) The driving factors behind the shift in the legal framework regarding the husband's right to rujuk are: the transformation of gender relations, the prevention of the abuse of rights by the husband, the maintenance of domestic harmony, and the application of the principle of consensualism (rida principle). (2) The methodological critiques of the arguments underlying the requirement of the wife's consent include: the misapplication of the rule of change over time, the conflict created between maslahah (public interest) and qath’i (definitive) texts as well as scholarly consensus (ijma'), logical confusion in requiring the wife's consent for the sake of achieving family harmony, incoherence in the status of talak raj’i (revocable divorce), and the manipulation of the interpretation of dalalah al-isyarah (allusive indication).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Quran al-Karim.

Affan, M. S. (2025). Perceraian sepihak oleh suami dalam perspektif hukum Islam dan keadilan gender. Hukagi: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(1).

Al-Baghawi, A. M. (1997). At-Tahdzib fii fiqh Imam Asy-Syafi’i (Cet. I). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Al-Burnu, M. S. (1995). Al-Wajiz fii idhohi qawaid al-fiqh al-kuliyyah (Cet. IV). Muassasah al-Risalah.

Al-Damiri, A. B. (2004). Al-Najm al-wahhaj fii syarh Minhaj (Cet. I). Dar al-Minhaj.

Al-Maraghi, A. M. (1946). Tafsir al-Maroghi (Cet. I). Syirkah Maktabah wa Mathba’ah Musthafa Al-Babi.

Al-Mawardi, A. H. A. M. (1999). Al-Hawi al-kabir (Cet. I). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Al-Ramli, M. A. A. (2003). Nihayah muhtaj (Cet. III). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Al-Umrani, A. H. (2000). Al-Bayan fii Mazhab Asy-Syafi’i (Cet. I). Dar al-Minhaj.

Al-Zuhaili, W. (t.t.). Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa adallatuh (Cet. IV). Dar al-Fikr.

Budiastuti, D., & Bandur, A. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas penelitian. Mitra Wacana Media.

Hasan, H., dkk. (2025). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.

Ibnu Rusyd, A. W. (2004). Bidayah al-mujtahid wa nihayah al-muqtashid. Dar al-Hadits.

Kementerian Agama RI. (2018). Kompilasi hukum Islam di Indonesia. Kementerian Agama RI.

Kurniawati, L., & Aris, N. (2022). Hak istri menolak rujuk pada masa iddah talak raj’i dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jimsya: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 1(1).

Lutpillah. (2022). Hak istri menolak rujuk suami pada KHI Pasal 164 dan 165 (Perspektif mashlahah mursalah) [Tesis, UIN Antasari Banjarmasin].

Nasution, R. R. (2018). Persetujuan istri tentang ruju’ dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam ditinjau dari perspektif fatwa Imam Syafi’i [Skripsi, IAIN Padangsidimpuan].

Nuroniyah, W. (2016). Kritik metodologis terhadap pembaharuan hukum perkawinan dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 1(1).

Rahmalia, L. (2025). Perbandingan pendapat Imam Syafi’i dengan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) Pasal 164 tentang kewajiban istri menerima dan menolak rujuk suami. Ar-Ra’yu: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 4(2).

Rufaida, A. (2019). Hak istri menolak rujuk dalam perspektif Islam dan analisis gender. Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam, Gender dan Anak, 14(2).

Umam, K. (2017). Penyerapan fiqh Mazhab Syafi’i dalam penyusunan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari’ah, 9(2).

Warson, A. (1984). Al-Munawwir kamus Arab-Indonesia. PP. Al-Munawwir.

Zikri, M., Adly, M. A., & Firmansyah, H. (2025). Analisis qawa’id fiqhiyyah terhadap masalah ruju dan ila’. Al Maqaranah: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Mazhab, 3(1).

https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/3/VkhwVUszTXJPVmQ2ZFRKamNIZG9RMVo2VEdsbVVUMDkjMw==/nikah-dan-cerai-menurut-provinsi.html.

https://food.detik.com/info-kuliner/d-7791190/duh-perceraian-pasangan-ini-dipicu-masalah-gelas-kotor#google_vignette.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

Muhammad Imam Hafili, & Misbahuzzulam, M. (2026). The Requirement of Wife’s Consent for Rujuk (Resumption of Marriage): A Normative Critique of Article 165 of the Compilation of Islamic Law from the Perspective of the Shafi‘i School of Thought. Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 9(4), 723–736. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i4.3861

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.