Nature and Values in Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i4.1695Keywords:
nature, value, researchAbstract
This article provides a comprehensive introduction to research, focusing on the definition, objectives, and basic steps involved in the research process. Research is considered a systematic effort to answer questions and solve problems, and can be divided into various types, such as quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method research. By providing a basic understanding of the research process, this article aims to help readers, especially students and novice researchers, understand and apply the principles of effective research. It explores the key characteristics that define quality scientific research. These characteristics include objectivity, systematicity, replicability, and accuracy. Through a literature review, this study found that objectivity is the foundation that allows research results to be widely accepted, while systematicity provides a clear structure to the process of data collection and analysis based on the literature review. These findings are expected to provide guidance for researchers and academics in conducting higher-quality research.
Downloads
References
Chih-Pei, H U, and Yan-Yi Chang. “John W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.” Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences 4, no. 2 (2017): 205–7.
Creswell. JW. “Research Design: Pendekatan Kulaitatif, Kuantitatif Dan Mixed.” Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.
Creswell, John W. The Mixed Methods Reader Mistos. Metodologia de Pesquisa. Sage, 2007.
Creswell, John W., Michael D. Fetters, and Nataliya V. Ivankova. “Designing a Mixed Methods Study in Primary Care.” Annals of Family Medicine 2, no. 1 (2004): 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.104.
Ivankova, Nataliya V, and John W Creswell. “Mixed Methods.” Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction 23 (2009): 135–61.
John W Creswell. “Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Desain Riset Memilih Diantara Lima Pendekatan.” Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.
Kite, Vance, Soonhye Park, and Eric Wiebe. “The Code-Centric Nature of Computational Thinking Education: A Review of Trends and Issues in Computational Thinking Education Research.” SAGE Open 11, no. 2 (2021): 21582440211016416. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016418.
Parris, Denise Linda, and Jon Welty Peachey. “A Systematic Literature Review of Servant Leadership Theory in Organizational Contexts.” Journal of Business Ethics 113, no. 3 (2013): 377–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1322-6.
Prof.Dr.Sugiyono. “Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.” Rake Sarasin, 2020. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=O-B3eJYAAAAJ&hl=en.
Sari, Mutia, Habibur Rachman, Noni Juli Astuti, Muhammad Win Afgani, and Rusdy Abdullah Siroj. “Explanatory Survey Dalam Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kuantitatif.” Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer 3, no. 01 (2022): 10–16. https://doi.org/10.47709/jpsk.v3i01.1953.
Wiyanto, Theodorus, Muchlas Samani, and S. Sugiyono. “The Developing Teaching Practice Model as an Effort to Improve the Quality of Mechanical Engineering Vocational School Teachers.” Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi 7, no. 3 (2018): 349. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v7i3.17923.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Teti Nurhayati, Rina Setiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
